<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Telephonoscope &#187; damages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://telephonoscope.com/tag/damages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://telephonoscope.com</link>
	<description>Talking back to the television</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pros and Cons</title>
		<link>http://telephonoscope.com/2010/01/27/pros-and-cons/</link>
		<comments>http://telephonoscope.com/2010/01/27/pros-and-cons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kvanaren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telephonoscope.com/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damages returned this week for its third season, and my feelings about it fall in the range of “that’s pretty cool, I guess” to “meh.”  Like most shows, there are things to enjoy and other things to dislike, but where some shows just have one particular character or plotline that mars its overall appeal, Damages [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Damages </em>returned this week for its third season, and my feelings about it fall in the range of “that’s pretty cool, I guess” to “meh.”  Like most shows, there are things to enjoy and other things to dislike, but where some shows just have one particular character or plotline that mars its overall appeal, <em>Damages </em>is like a bag of Bertie Bott’s Every Flavored Beans – maybe you pull out strawberry shortcake, or maybe you pull out a nice orange juice and toothpaste combo, and your chances are even either way. I’m just as likely to be disgusted as I am entertained by <em>Damages</em>, so I’m going to use this post to try and sort myself out.</p>
<p>Pro: Interesting, complicated multi-plot setup based on multiple storylines set at different times. This can make the show absorbing and addictive.</p>
<p>Con: Ridiculously over-the-top leaping between timelines, which can make the show disjointed and incoherent. You think the time travel on <em>Lost </em>is bad? These are each of the title cards from just the first episode of season three:</p>
<div id="attachment_790" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-790" title="damages 301 1" src="http://www.telephonoscope.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/damages-301-1.jpg" alt="Okay, this is only six of them, and I left out at least two. *Spoiler alert* - they both said &quot;6 Months Later.&quot;" width="600" height="200" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Okay, this is only six of them, and I left out at least two. *Spoiler alert* - they both said &quot;6 Months Later.&quot;</p></div>
<p>Pro: Huge, talented cast, which in season three includes Glenn Close and Rose Byrne, as well as Lily Tomlin (yay!)</p>
<p>Con: Cast is great, characters are not very subtle. Because the plot is based on betrayals and obscured motives, everyone flips rapidly back and forth between being evil and then actually being innocent. This makes them less like rich, well-rounded characters and more like repeatedly tossed coins (and….flip! she’s evil again.)</p>
<div id="attachment_791" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-791" title="damages 301 2" src="http://www.telephonoscope.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/damages-301-2.jpg" alt="Glenn Close and Lily Tomlin in Damages. Lily's character is good so far, but look at that screenshot! She'll turn evil eventually. " width="600" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Glenn Close and Lily Tomlin in Damages. Lily&#39;s character is good so far, but look at that screenshot! She&#39;ll turn evil eventually. </p></div>
<p>Pro: Plot is unpredictable, complex and seems to be planned well in advance, which means pieces that show up in the beginning tie together well by the end.</p>
<p>Con: While the actual content of the plot is hard to predict, its rhythms are not. As soon as you think you know something for certain, something will happen to undo that knowledge. As soon as somebody’s allegiances change, they’re going to get killed. Newly introduced minor character? Yeah, he’s a spy/assassin/FBI agent/illegitimate son/drug kingpin.</p>
<div id="attachment_792" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-792" title="damages 301 3" src="http://www.telephonoscope.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/damages-301-3.jpg" alt="Why is everyone so monochromatic and glowy six months from now?" width="600" height="250" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Why is everyone so monochromatic and glowy six months from now?</p></div>
<p>Pro: <em>Damages </em>has a distinct visual style, making it extremely recognizable and helping it seem more like a unified whole.</p>
<p>Con: The visual style, for the most part, manages to be an unlikely combination of monotone grey-ness and overexposed bright spots, which means everything looks like it was bleached and then shot with a shaky camera.</p>
<p>See what I mean about this show? It’s like Janus. Or Two-Face. Or that comedy/tragedy mask. So while I may tune into <em>Damages </em>this season, I doubt I’ll blog much about it, unless Lily Tomlin is just so awesome that she overwhelms the show’s many negatives. And I wouldn’t put it past her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://telephonoscope.com/2010/01/27/pros-and-cons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

